U.S. v. Ruiz-Alvarez, No. 96-17272 (9th Cir.) (211 F.3d 1181) (April 25, 2000) (Judge Barry G. Silverman)
Loaded on April 1, 2000
published in Punch and Jurists
April 10, 2000
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
United States v. Colvin, 204 F.3d 1221 (9th Cir. 2000) (Judge Hawkins)
United States v. Ruiz-Alvarez, 211 F.3d 1181 (9th Cir. 2000) (Judge Silverman)
In both of these cases the Ninth Circuit grappled with the issue of when a sentence is actually “final” - a concept that has many permutations. ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Carmell v. Texas, No. 98-7540 (U.S. Supreme Court) (529 U.S. 513; 120 S.Ct. 1620) (May 1, 2000) (Justice Stevens)
- Jurek v. Texas, No. 75-5394 (U.S. Supreme Court) (428 U.S. 262; 96 S.Ct. 2950) (July 2, 1976) (Justice Stevens)
- U.S. v. Ruiz-Alvarez, No. 96-17272 (9th Cir.) (211 F.3d 1181) (April 25, 2000) (Judge Barry G. Silverman)
- Slack v. McDaniel, No. 98-6322 (U.S. Supreme Court) (529 U.S. 473; 120 S.Ct. 1595) (April 26, 2000) (Justice Kennedy)
- Edwards v. Carpenter, No. 98-2060 (U.S. Supreme Court) (529 U.S. 446; 120 S.Ct. 1587) (April 25, 2000) (Justice Scalia)
- U.S. v. Colvin, No. 99-35269 (9th Cir.) (204 F.3d 1221) (March 1, 2000) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
- In Re Sealed Case, No. 97-3104 (D.C. Cir.) (204 F.3d 1170) (March 14, 2000) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)
- U.S. v. Martinez, No. 99-1285 (2nd Cir.) (207 F.3d 133) (March 21, 2000) (Judge Robert A. Katzmann)
- U.S. v. McKissick, No. 98-6320 (10th Cir.) (204 F.3d 1282) (February 24, 2000) (Judge Wade Brorby)
More from these topics:
- Second Circuit Holds Full De Novo Resentencing Hearing Required Based on Partially Successful Habeas Petition Where Resentencing Judge Not Original Judge and Changed Circumstances Plausibly Alleged, Dec. 1, 2024. Resentencing, De Novo Resentencing, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Arizona Supreme Court Allows Third PCR Motion Based on IAC for Erroneous Advice About Parole Eligibility Due to ‘Pervasive Confusion’ Regarding Parole Within Legal Community, Nov. 1, 2024. Parole, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Indiana Supreme Court Says “Summary Judgment Is Not Summary Trial,” Remanding State Prisoner’s Malpractice Claim to a Jury, Aug. 15, 2024. Malpractice (Attorneys), Summary Judgment, Resentencing, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Louisiana Supreme Court Finds Prosecution Withheld Favorable Impeachment and Exculpatory Evidence in Violation of Brady, Aug. 1, 2024. Exculpatory No Doctrine, Resentencing, Evidence - Failure to Disclose, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Ninth Circuit Announces District Courts Must Either Orally Pronounce All Discretionary ‘Standard’ Conditions of Supervised Release in the Presence of Defendant or Provide Conditions in Writing Prior to Sentencing, Feb. 15, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Applicable Guidelines Issues, Sentencing Hearing, Right to be Present, Conditions of, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Ninth Circuit: Government’s Inflammatory Arguments in Sentencing Memorandum and at Sentencing Hearing Implicitly Breached Plea Agreement Promise Not to Recommend Sentence in Excess of Low-End Guidelines Range, June 15, 2023. War on Drugs, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings, Validity of.
- Eleventh Circuit: District Court ‘Mischaracterizing’ Habeas Claim Left Claim Unresolved in Violation of Clisby, Requiring Remand, Jan. 15, 2021. Habeas Corpus, De Novo Resentencing, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.