Skip navigation

Lauro v. Charles, No. 99-7239 (2nd Cir.) (219 F.3d 202) (July 28, 2000) (Judge Guido Calabresi)

Here the Court held that the plaintiff's staged "perp walk" implicated his privacy rights, and since no legitimate government purposes was served, the perp walk violated the plaintiff's constitutional right to be free from unreasonble seizures.

In this case, the plaintiff brought a § 1983 suit against the New York ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login