U.S. v. Kithcart, No. 99-1082 (3rd Cir.) (218 F.3d 213) (June 28, 2000) (Judge Theodore A. McKee)
Loaded on Aug. 1, 2000
published in Punch and Jurists
August 21, 2000
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
Here the Court held that the district court erred when it allowed the Government, without request or explanation, to introduce new evidence at the remanded hearing to support its claim that it had probable cause to search the defendant in the first place.
In this case, the Third Circuit originally ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Marquez-Gallegos, No. 99-1270 (10th Cir.) (217 F.3d 1267) (May 3, 2000) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon)
- U.S. v. Hicks, No. 99-10352 (9th Cir.) (217 F.3d 1038) (July 31, 2000) (Judge Susan P. Graber)
- U.S. v. Kithcart, No. 99-1082 (3rd Cir.) (218 F.3d 213) (June 28, 2000) (Judge Theodore A. McKee)
- U.S. v. Hilario, No. 00-1406 (1st Cir.) (218 F.3d 19) (July 17, 2000) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Collins, No. 98-3475 (6th Cir.) (226 F.3d 457) (August 31, 2000) (Judge Allen E. Norris)
- U.S. v. Aguillard, No. 99-13358 (11th Cir.) (217 F.3d 1319) (July 5, 2000) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Hutzell, No. 99-3719 (8th Cir.) (217 F.3d 966) (July 5, 2000) (Judge Morris Sheppard Arnold)
- In Re Lightfoot, No. D-00-0002 (7th Cir.) (217 F.3d 914) (May 19, 2000) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
- U.S. v. Rhynes, No. 97-4466 (4th Cir.) (218 F.3d 310) (July 10, 2000) (Judge Robert Bruce King)
- U.S. v. Baird, No. 99-1305 (3rd Cir.) (218 F.3d 221) (June 26, 2000) (Judge Joseph F. Jr. Weis)
- U.S. v. Carlson, No. 00-1073 (8th Cir.) (217 F.3d 986) (July 10, 2000) (Judge George G. Fagg)
More from these topics:
- Second Circuit Holds Full De Novo Resentencing Hearing Required Based on Partially Successful Habeas Petition Where Resentencing Judge Not Original Judge and Changed Circumstances Plausibly Alleged, Dec. 1, 2024. Resentencing, De Novo Resentencing, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Arizona Supreme Court Allows Third PCR Motion Based on IAC for Erroneous Advice About Parole Eligibility Due to ‘Pervasive Confusion’ Regarding Parole Within Legal Community, Nov. 1, 2024. Parole, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Indiana Supreme Court Says “Summary Judgment Is Not Summary Trial,” Remanding State Prisoner’s Malpractice Claim to a Jury, Aug. 15, 2024. Malpractice (Attorneys), Summary Judgment, Resentencing, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Louisiana Supreme Court Finds Prosecution Withheld Favorable Impeachment and Exculpatory Evidence in Violation of Brady, Aug. 1, 2024. Exculpatory No Doctrine, Resentencing, Evidence - Failure to Disclose, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Ninth Circuit Announces District Courts Must Either Orally Pronounce All Discretionary ‘Standard’ Conditions of Supervised Release in the Presence of Defendant or Provide Conditions in Writing Prior to Sentencing, Feb. 15, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Applicable Guidelines Issues, Sentencing Hearing, Right to be Present, Conditions of, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Ninth Circuit: Government’s Inflammatory Arguments in Sentencing Memorandum and at Sentencing Hearing Implicitly Breached Plea Agreement Promise Not to Recommend Sentence in Excess of Low-End Guidelines Range, June 15, 2023. War on Drugs, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings, Validity of.
- Eleventh Circuit: District Court ‘Mischaracterizing’ Habeas Claim Left Claim Unresolved in Violation of Clisby, Requiring Remand, Jan. 15, 2021. Habeas Corpus, De Novo Resentencing, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.