Carlisle v. U.S., No. 94-9247 (U.S. Supreme Court) (517 U.S. 416; 116 S.Ct. 1460) (April 29, 1996) (Justice Scalia)
In this case the Court observed, in dicta, that "it is difficult to conceive of a situation in a federal criminal case today where a writ of coram nobis would be necessary or appropriate." (Id., at 429).
Here, the Court stated in dicta that coram nobis relief was "traditionally available …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login