Carlisle v. U.S., No. 94-9247 (U.S. Supreme Court) (517 U.S. 416; 116 S.Ct. 1460) (April 29, 1996) (Justice Scalia)
In this case the Court observed, in dicta, that "it is difficult to conceive of a situation in a federal criminal case today where a writ of coram nobis would be necessary or appropriate." (Id., at 429).
Here, the Court stated in dicta that coram nobis relief was "traditionally available ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login