U.S. v. 87 Blackheath Road, No. 99-6049 (2nd Cir.) (201 F.3d 98) (January 31, 2000) (Per Curiam)
Loaded on Feb. 1, 2000
published in Punch and Jurists
February 28, 2000
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Indigent Defendants - Fees and Expenses.
Here the Court held that a claimant had no Sixth Amendment right to counsel to challenge a civil forfeiture, and thus had no entitlement to the appointment of CJA counsel for such proceedings.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Galbraith, No. 99-1676 (7th Cir.) (200 F.3d 1006) (January 11, 2000) (Judge Richard D. Cudahy)
- U.S. v. Lester, No. 98-4153 (8th Cir.) (200 F.3d 1179) (January 31, 2000) (Judge Morris Sheppard Arnold)
- Boyle v. Million, No. 98-6485 (6th Cir.) (201 F.3d 711) (January 7, 2000) (Judge Martha Craig Daughtrey)
- Matthew v. Johnson, No. 97-10990 (5th Cir.) (201 F.3d 353) (January 11, 2000) (Judge Carolyn Dineen King)
- U.S. v. Dice, No. 98-3092 (6th Cir.) (200 F.3d 978) (January 6, 2000) (Judge Nathaniel R. Jones)
- Murr v. U.S., No. 98-6202 (6th Cir.) (200 F.3d 895) (January 7, 2000) (Judge Eric L. Clay)
- Hawkins v. Hargett, No. 98-5162 (10th Cir.) (200 F.3d 1279) (December 29, 1999) (Judge Stephanie K. Seymour)
- U.S. v. Drew, No. 98-3120 (D.C. Cir.) (200 F.3d 871) (January 25, 2000) (Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson)
- U.S. v. Anderson, No. 98-3285 (11th Cir.) (200 F.3d 1344) (January 18, 2000) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Laden, No. S(6) 98 CR. 1023 (LBS) (S.D.N.Y.) (92 F.Supp.2d 189) (March 13, 2000) (Judge Leonard B. Sand)
- U.S. v. 87 Blackheath Road, No. 99-6049 (2nd Cir.) (201 F.3d 98) (January 31, 2000) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Dice, No. 98-3092 (6th Cir.) (200 F.3d 978) (January 6, 2000) (Judge Nathaniel R. Jones)
- U.S. v. Sparger, No. MO-98-113M (W.D.Tex.) (79 F.Supp.2d 714) (December 30, 1999) (Judge Magistrate)
- U.S. v. Galbraith, No. 99-1676 (7th Cir.) (200 F.3d 1006) (January 11, 2000) (Judge Richard D. Cudahy)
More from these topics:
- Indigent Defense: Appointed Counsel Does Not Mean Free Counsel, Dec. 1, 2024. Appointment of Counsel, Indigent Defense, Indigent Defendants - Fees and Expenses.
- Michigan Supreme Court: Fundamentally Unfair to Deny Indigent Defendant Funds to Retain False Confession Expert Where Genuineness of Confession Key Issue at Trial, Dec. 1, 2024. Expert Witnesses/Testimony, False Confessions, Indigent Defendants - Fees and Expenses.
- Fourth Circuit Chides Virginia Magistrate for Assuming Prisoners Proceed IFP, Aug. 15, 2024. Filing Fees, Indigent Defendants - Fees and Expenses, In Forma Pauperis.
- $3.25 Million Settlement Reached With Defendants Jailed in Missouri “Debtor’s Prison” for Unpaid Fines, Fees, Oct. 15, 2023. Settlements, Indigent Defendants - Fees and Expenses, Ability to Pay, Inmate Financial Responsibility Program (IFRP).
- Virginia DOC Resists Prisoner Fee Cuts, April 1, 2023. Cost of Prison Systems, Indigent Defendants - Fees and Expenses, Reimbursement of Costs.
- Colorado Supreme Court Announces Parents’ Income That’s Unavailable to Defendant Who Lives With Them Expense-Free Not Included in Indigency Determination for Court-Appointed Counsel, May 1, 2022. Appointment of Counsel, Indigent Defendants - Fees and Expenses.
- Pay-to-Stay Fees Impoverish Prisoners, Increase Recidivism, March 1, 2021. Indigent Defendants - Fees and Expenses, Recidivism.
- Alabama Court Allows Lawsuit Over Indigent Traffic Offenders Jailed for Not Paying Fines, Jan. 1, 2021. Traffic stop, Indigent Defendants - Fees and Expenses, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- California First State to Eliminate Post-Prison Fees, Dec. 1, 2020. Booking Fees, Indigent Defendants - Fees and Expenses.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.