Lambrix v. Singletary, No. 96-5658 (U.S. Supreme Court) (520 U.S. 518; 117 S.Ct. 1517) (May 12, 1997) (Justice Scalia)
This case is noted for its amplification of the two exceptions to the rule set forth in Teague v. Lane that a petitioner may not generally take advantage of new rules of criminal procedure announced after his conviction has become final.
In Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), the ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login