Lambrix v. Singletary, No. 96-5658 (U.S. Supreme Court) (520 U.S. 518; 117 S.Ct. 1517) (May 12, 1997) (Justice Scalia)
This case is noted for its amplification of the two exceptions to the rule set forth in Teague v. Lane that a petitioner may not generally take advantage of new rules of criminal procedure announced after his conviction has become final.
In Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), the …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login