Skip navigation

U.S. v. Baxt, No. Crim. No. 99-75 (D.N.J.) (74 F.Supp.2d 425) (October 26, 1999) (Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky)

The Court summarized its views by stating: " I find that the Defendant, Paul Baxt, has not demonstrated that the Government's delay in bringing the indictment in this case was caused by an effort by the Government to obtain a tactical advantage over Baxt. Moreover, Baxt has failed to demonstrate ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login