Skip navigation

In Re McGinn, No. 00-10367 (5th Cir.) (213 F.3d 884) (June 1, 2000) (Per Curiam)

Here the Court held that advances in DNA technology five years after the defendant's trial and conviction was not enough, on its own, to warrant granting leave to file a second or successive writ based on newly discovered evidence.

Here the Court held that a habeas petitioner was not entitled ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login