U.S. v. Kenrick, No. 98-1282 (1st Cir.) (221 F.3d 19) (August 2, 2000) (Judge Kermit A. Lipez)
Here the en banc Court held that "intent to harm" is not an element of bank fraud under 18 USC § 1344, concluding that there was no "consensus" among the Circuits on that issue - although that may have been a broad overstatement of the truth.
We always get nervous ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login