U.S. v. Allen, No. 96-6313 (6th Cir.) (211 F.3d 970) (May 4, 2000) (Judge Danny J. Boggs)
Loaded on June 1, 2000
published in Punch and Jurists
June 19, 2000
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions.
Here a divided en banc Court held that an unsupported tip is sufficient to support a warrant application - over the strong dissent of Judge Clay who accused the majority of driving a stake through the heart of the Fourth Amendment.
In 1995, the police in Chattanooga, TN, received a ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Truesdale, No. 99-10096 (5th Cir.) (211 F.3d 898) (May 5, 2000) (Judge Carolyn Dineen King)
- U.S. v. Bein, No. 99-3822 (3rd Cir.) (214 F.3d 408) (June 5, 2000) (Judge Morton I. Greenberg)
- U.S. v. Mohammad, No. CR.98-342(WGB) (D.N.J.) (95 F.Supp.2d 236) (April 14, 2000) (Judge William G. Bassler)
- U.S. v. Elkins, No. 96-20152 D (W.D.Tenn.) (95 F.Supp.2d 796) (March 6, 2000) (Judge Bernice B. Donald)
- U.S. v. Hancock, No. CRIM.A. 97-664 (E.D.Pa.) (95 F.Supp.2d 280) (May 5, 2000) (Judge Marvin Katz)
- U.S. v. Hughes, No. Crim.A.99-10405-REK (D.Mass.) (95 F.Supp.2d 49) (May 12, 2000) (Judge Robert E. Keeton)
- U.S. v. Whitt, No. 99-2017 (7th Cir.) (211 F.3d 1022) (May 1, 2000) (Judge John L. Coffey)
- Hunter v. Heath, No. CV-00-323-ST (D.Or.) (95 F.Supp.2d 1140) (April 11, 2000) (Judge Magistrate)
- Lyndonville Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Lussier, No. 98-7079 (2nd Cir.) (211 F.3d 697) (May 3, 2000) (Judge Richard J. Cardamone)
- U.S. v. Allen, No. 96-6313 (6th Cir.) (211 F.3d 970) (May 4, 2000) (Judge Danny J. Boggs)
- U.S. v. Elkins, No. 96-20152 D (W.D.Tenn.) (95 F.Supp.2d 796) (March 6, 2000) (Judge Bernice B. Donald)
- Wilson v. Shelby County, Ala., No. CV99-TMP-110-S (N.D.Ala.) (95 F.Supp.2d 1258) (May 4, 2000) (Judge Magistrate)
- U.S. v. Hancock, No. CRIM.A. 97-664 (E.D.Pa.) (95 F.Supp.2d 280) (May 5, 2000) (Judge Marvin Katz)
More from these topics:
- First Circuit Holds No Emergency-Aid Exception to Warrant Requirement Where Police Have Information That Subject Is Already Deceased, Feb. 15, 2025. Emergency Aid Doctrine, Police/Govt Misconduct, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions, Statements By a Deceased Person.
- Nevada Supreme Court Announces Incorporated Probable Cause Affidavit Cannot Broaden Scope of Warrant’s Description of Places and Persons to be Searched or Items to Be Seized, Dec. 1, 2024. Probable/Proximate Cause, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions.
- Delaware Supreme Court: Counsel Ineffective for Failing to Challenge Search of Cellphone Where Consent Was Ambiguous and Warrant Constituted a General Warrant, Nov. 1, 2024. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Searches - Cellphones/Computers/Internet, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions.
- Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies Mansor Ruling for Search Warrants for Digital Data and Announces Framework for Suppression When Warrant Contains Both Constitutional and Unconstitutional Search Categories, Oct. 1, 2023. Particularity Requirement, Electronic Surveillance, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions.
- State Attorneys General Fear New FedEx and UPS Shipping Policies Will Allow the Feds to Bypass Warrant Requirements by Creating a Private Gun Registry, Dec. 13, 2022. Warrantless Searches, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions, Guns - Type of.
- Georgia Supreme Court Declares ‘Relevance’ Not Legal Standard for Suppression Determination Where Items Seized Outside Scope of Warrant, Clarifies Plain View Doctrine Proper Standard, and Overrules McBee, Walsh Line of Cases, Feb. 15, 2022. Suppression of Evidence, Searches - Plain View, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions.
- Reverse Location Warrants Neglect Particularity Requirement, May 15, 2021. Electronic Surveillance, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions.
- Georgia Supreme Court Affirms Right to Resist Unlawful Arrest and Announces Right Includes Use of Proportionate Force Against Government Property, Dec. 15, 2020. Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions, Wrongful Use of Force.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.