Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Cherry, No. 99-7019 (10th Cir.) (211 F.3d 575) (May 2, 2000) (Judge Carlos Lucero)

Loaded on June 1, 2000 published in Punch and Jurists June 12, 2000
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Declarant Unavailable Exception.

Here, taking a broad view of the scope of conspiratorial liability, the Court interpreted the provisions of the new Fed.R.Evid. 804(b)(6) which deals with another exception to the general prohibition against the use of hearsay evidence.

While the decision in this case may have limited application for most criminal defense ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Hernandez-Zuniga, No. 99-40620 (5th Cir.) (215 F.3d 483) (June 14, 2000) (Judge Carolyn Dineen King)
  2. U.S. v. Hernandez-Zuniga, No. 99-40620 (5th Cir.) (215 F.3d 483) (June 14, 2000) (Judge Carolyn Dineen King)
  3. Kay v. Reno, No. Civ. No. 1:CV-99-0251 (M.D.Pa.) (94 F.Supp.2d 546) (April 19, 2000) (Judge Sylvia H. Rambo)
  4. U.S. v. Brooks, No. 99-3448 (8th Cir.) (215 F.3d 842) (June 14, 2000) (Judge Gerald W. Heaney)
  5. U.S. v. Cherry, No. 99-7019 (10th Cir.) (211 F.3d 575) (May 2, 2000) (Judge Carlos Lucero)
  6. U.S. v. Banuelos-Rodriguez, No. 96-50297 (9th Cir.) (215 F.3d 969) (June 14, 2000) (Judge Susan P. Graber)
  7. Rogowski v. Reno, No. Civ. 3:99cv790(PCD) (D.Conn.) (94 F.Supp.2d 177) (October 28, 1999) (Judge Peter C. Dorsey)

More from these topics: