Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Logan, No. 98-2839 (8th Cir.) (210 F.3d 820) (April 24, 2000) (Judge Morris Sheppard Arnold)

Loaded on June 1, 2000 published in Punch and Jurists June 05, 2000
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Bruton Error.

Here the en banc court granted a rehearing to determine whether the defendant was denied his constitutional rights under the Confrontation Clause when a nontestifying co-defendant's statement that he planned and committed the robbery in question with "another individual" was admitted into evidence, even if the statement might have implicated ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Apprendi v. New Jersey, No. 99-478 (U.S. Supreme Court) (530 U.S. 466; 120 S.Ct. 2348) (June 26, 2000) (Justice Stevens)
  2. Dickerson v. U.S., No. 99-5525 (U.S. Supreme Court) (530 U.S. 428; 120 S.Ct. 2326) (June 26, 2000) (Justice Rehnquist)
  3. Flores v. Johnson, No. 99-40064 (5th Cir.) (210 F.3d 456) (April 20, 2000) (Per Curiam)
  4. U.S. v. Mezas De Jesus, No. 98-50639 (9th Cir.) (217 F.3d 638) (June 16, 2000) (Judge Harry Pregerson)
  5. U.S. v. Nava-Ramirez, No. 99-4123 (10th Cir.) (210 F.3d 1128) (April 10, 2000) (Judge Michael R. Murphy)
  6. U.S. v. Logan, No. 98-2839 (8th Cir.) (210 F.3d 820) (April 24, 2000) (Judge Morris Sheppard Arnold)
  7. U.S. v. Ross, No. 98-4100 (8th Cir.) (210 F.3d 916) (April 21, 2000) (Judge Donald P. Lay)

More from these topics: