Skip navigation

Gray v. Maryland, No. 96-8653 (U.S. Supreme Court) (523 U.S. 185; 118 S.Ct. 1151) (February 9, 1998) (Justice Breyer)

Here the court held that confessions otherwise barred by the Bruton rule would not be permitted if they are redacted in a manner that leads the jury to easily draw an inference that the omissions referred to the defendant.

In this case defendant Anthony Bell gave a confession that he, ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login