Skip navigation

U.S. v. Byrne, No. 98-50405 (9th Cir.) (203 F.3d 671) (January 31, 2000) (Judge James Ware)

On a motion for reconsideration, the Ninth Circuit somewhat modified its earler decision reported at 192 F.3d 888, this time stating: "In the present case, we need hold only that the Double Jeopardy Clause was not violated because it is clear from the facts underlying the present appeal that the …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login