Skip navigation

U.S. v. Byrne, No. 98-50405 (9th Cir.) (203 F.3d 671) (January 31, 2000) (Judge James Ware)

On a motion for reconsideration, the Ninth Circuit somewhat modified its earler decision reported at 192 F.3d 888, this time stating: "In the present case, we need hold only that the Double Jeopardy Clause was not violated because it is clear from the facts underlying the present appeal that the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login