Weeks v. Angelone, No. 99-5746 (U.S. Supreme Court) (528 U.S. 225; 120 S.Ct. 727) (January 19, 2000) (Justice Rehnquist)
Loaded on March 13, 2000
published in Punch and Jurists
January 03, 2000
Filed under:
Jury Instructions,
Punch And Jurists.
Here the Court held that, in a capital sentencing case, a jury’s inquiry about the meaning of an instruction previously given can be answered with a ritualistic and non-responsive direction to simply re-read the questioned instruction.
In this capital punishment case, the Supreme Court addressed the issue of …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Weeks v. Angelone, No. 99-5746 (U.S. Supreme Court) (528 U.S. 225; 120 S.Ct. 727) (January 19, 2000) (Justice Rehnquist)
- U.S. v. Bradley, No. 99-1783 (7th Cir.) (196 F.3d 762) (November 4, 1999) (Judge William J. Bauer)
- U.S. v. Walker, No. 99-3071 (3rd Cir.) (202 F.3d 181) (January 20, 2000) (Judge Edward R. Becker)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 98-10297 (9th Cir.) (196 F.3d 1034) (November 12, 1999) (Judge Charles E. Wiggins)
- Froehlich v. State of Wis., Dept. of Corrections, No. 99-1102 (7th Cir.) (196 F.3d 800) (November 10, 1999) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
- U.S. v. Hill, No. 99-1158 (7th Cir.) (196 F.3d 806) (November 12, 1999) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
- U.S. v. Verrecchia, No. 98-1973 (1st Cir.) (196 F.3d 294) (November 19, 1999) (Judge Kermit A. Lipez)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 98-5957 (6th Cir.) (196 F.3d 676) (November 20, 1999) (Judge Alice M. Batchelder)
- U.S. v. McIntosh, No. 98-4023 (7th Cir.) (198 F.3d 995) (January 5, 2000) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- U.S. v. Irons, No. 98-3732 (6th Cir.) (196 F.3d 634) (October 27, 1999) (Judge Leroy J. Jr. Contie)
- U.S. v. Bradley, No. 99-1783 (7th Cir.) (196 F.3d 762) (November 4, 1999) (Judge William J. Bauer)
- U.S. v. Sotomayor Vazquez, No. CR. 97-091(JAF) (D.Puerto Rico) (69 F.Supp.2d 286) (October 25, 1999) (Judge Jose Antonio Fuste)
- U.S. v. Johnson, No. 99-30045 (9th Cir.) (196 F.3d 1000) (October 28, 1999) (Judge William A. Fletcher)
- U.S. v. Walker, No. 99-3071 (3rd Cir.) (202 F.3d 181) (January 20, 2000) (Judge Edward R. Becker)
- U.S. v. Gilbert, No. 98-3635 (11th Cir.) (198 F.3d 1293) (December 28, 1999) (Judge Edward E. Carnes)
- U.S. v. Lacy, No. 98-10185 (D.Mass.) (99 F.Supp.2d 108) (May 19, 2000) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
- U.S. v. Weston, No. CRIM. A. 98-357 EGS (D.D.C.) (69 F.Supp.2d 99) (September 9, 1999) (Judge Emmet G. Sullivan)
More from these topics:
- Aphantasia: Why Truthful Witnesses Can Sound Like Liars, Jan. 1, 2026. Jury Instructions, False Statements/Perjury, Self-Authentication, Voir Dire, Evidence - Integrity/Reliability of, Eyewitness Identification, Character/Reputation/Propensity.
- California Supreme Court Announces Pre-2009 Provocative Act Murder Convictions Are Not Categorically Ineligible for Resentencing Under § 1172.6, Dec. 15, 2025. Jury Instructions, Retroactivity, Murder/Felony Murder, Accessories and Accomplices.
- Third Circuit: Where Prosecutor “Flooded” Jury Trial With Evidence of Defendant’s Prior Bad Acts, Counsel Was Constitutionally Ineffective in Not Seeking Contemporaneous Limiting Instructions and Not Objecting When Evidence Went Beyond Limited Purpose –, Oct. 15, 2025. Jury Instructions, Strickland Standard, Failure to Preserve Challenge, Motive/Opportunity/Intent/Identity Evidence, Bad Acts Evidence.
- Illinois Supreme Court Announces Conviction for Attempted First Degree Murder Requires ‘Intent to Kill Without Lawful Justification, Aug. 1, 2025. Jury Instructions, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Inconsistent.
- South Carolina Supreme Court Announces Traditional Four-Element Standard for When Person Has Right to Use Deadly Force in Self-Defense Not Applicable to Non-Deadly Force Self-Defense Analysis, May 15, 2025. Defenses, Jury Instructions.
- Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Standard for Determining Whether a Defendant Is Entitled to Jury Instructions on Self-defense and Defense of Others, May 15, 2025. Defenses, Jury Instructions, Jury Instructions in Jury Room.
- Maryland Supreme Court: Trial Court Abused Its Discretion by Failing to Exercise That Discretion Where It Summarily Refused Requested Jury Instruction Because It Was a Non-Pattern Instruction and ‘Some Evidence’ Supported the Instruction, March 15, 2025. Jury Instructions, Evidence - Failure to Disclose.
- Massachusetts Supreme Court Vacates Threat-Based Conviction on First Amendment Grounds Because Jury Instructions Failed to Include Mens Rea Element Mandated by Counterman for ‘True-Threat’ Conviction, Feb. 15, 2025. Jury Instructions, Resentencing, Threats, Negligence/Reckless Endangerment.
- Ohio Supreme Court Announces Self-Defense Jury Instruction Does Not Require Intent to Harm or Kill Assailant, Oct. 1, 2024. Defenses, Jury Instructions, Motive/Opportunity/Intent/Identity Evidence.
- Fourth Circuit Vacates Where Instructions Failed to Inform Jury That Mens Rea of ‘Knowingly or Intentionally’ Applies to ‘Except as Authorized’ in 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), June 15, 2024. Jury Instructions, Essential Elements of Crime, Mens Rea Element, Elements of Offense, Failure to Instruct on Scienter Requirement.