Martinez v. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate Dist., No. 98-7809 (U.S. Supreme Court) (528 U.S. 152; 120 S.Ct. 684) (January 12, 2000) (Justice Stevens)
Loaded on March 7, 2000
published in Punch and Jurists
December 27, 1999
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Pro Se Issues.
Here the Court held that a criminal defendant's constitutional right to represent himself at trial, that was recognized in Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975), does not apply to appeals, which were not available at common law.
In a ruling that certainly adds to the growing impediments …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Martinez v. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate Dist., No. 98-7809 (U.S. Supreme Court) (528 U.S. 152; 120 S.Ct. 684) (January 12, 2000) (Justice Stevens)
- Illinois v. Wardlow, No. 98-1036 (U.S. Supreme Court) (528 U.S. 119; 120 S.Ct. 673) (January 12, 2000) (Justice Rehnquist)
- California Attorneys for Criminal Justice v. Butts, No. 97-56499 (9th Cir.) (195 F.3d 1039) (November 8, 1999) (Judge Jr. William C. Canby)
- U.S. v. Rodrigues, No. CRIM. A. CR-98-0686 (E.D.N.Y.) (68 F.Supp.2d 178) (September 28, 1999) (Judge David G. Trager)
- U.S. v. Dickerson, No. 98-6452 (10th Cir.) (195 F.3d 1183) (October 20, 1999) (Judge Mary Beck Briscoe)
- U.S. v. Martin, No. 98-3831 (8th Cir.) (195 F.3d 1018) (November 18, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- People's Mojahedin Org. of Iran v. Dept. of State, No. 97-1648 (D.C. Cir.) (182 F.3d 17) (June 25, 1999) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)
- A.C.L.U. v. Reno, No. 98-5591 (E.D.Pa.) (31 F.Supp.2d 473) (February 1, 1999) (Judge Lowell A. Jr. Reed)
- Kirby v. James, No. 98-6236 (11th Cir.) (195 F.3d 1285) (November 17, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Cones, No. 99-1292 (7th Cir.) (195 F.3d 941) (October 28, 1999) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
- U.S. v. Gallo, No. 98-4381 (11th Cir.) (195 F.3d 1278) (November 17, 1999) (Judge Stanley Marcus)
- Cain v. Rock, No. Civ. Y-98-1930 (D.Md.) (67 F.Supp.2d 544) (October 14, 1999) (Judge Joseph H. Young)
- Hawkins v. Freeman, No. 96-7539 (4th Cir.) (195 F.3d 732) (November 9, 1999) (Judge James Dickson Jr. Phillips)
- U.S. v. Symington, No. 98-10070 (9th Cir.) (195 F.3d 1080) (June 22, 1999) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher)
- Maria v. McElroy, No. 98 CV 6596(JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (68 F.Supp.2d 206) (October 7, 1999) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. Rhynes, No. 97-4465 (4th Cir.) (196 F.3d 207) (October 26, 1999) (Judge Alexander Jr. Williams)
- California Attorneys for Criminal Justice v. Butts, No. 97-56499 (9th Cir.) (195 F.3d 1039) (November 8, 1999) (Judge Jr. William C. Canby)
More from these topics:
- Fifth Circuit Remands Louisiana Detainee’s Medical Grievance Case, Nov. 1, 2025. Systemic Medical Neglect, Summary Judgment, Discovery, Pro Se Issues, Grounds for Relief, Deliberate Indifference.
- Eleventh Circuit Declines to Extend to Summary Judgment Proceedings a Rule Requiring District Courts to Notify Pro Se Litigants, Nov. 1, 2025. Staff-Prisoner Harassment, BOP Litigation Reports, Summary Judgment, Pro Se Issues, Unlawful Detention.
- Colorado Supreme Court Announces When Deciding Defendant’s Pro Se Motion Requesting Counsel on Postconviction Review, Trial Court Must Either Deny Entire Motion or Permit All Claims If Any Have Arguable Merit, Dec. 15, 2024. Appointment of Counsel, After Request for Counsel, Pro Se Issues.
- ‘Data for Defenders’: Valuable New Resource for Defense Counsel and Pro Se Litigants, Oct. 1, 2023. Databases, Pro Se Issues.
- Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies There Is No Per Se Rule Excluding Self-Serving Hearsay, Sept. 1, 2023. Pro Se Issues, Hearsay Evidence, Exclusionary Rule.
- Sixth Circuit Reverses Dismissal of Retaliation Suit by Pro Se Michigan Prisoner, July 1, 2021. Retaliation for Litigating, Pro Se Issues.
- Ninth Circuit: Rehaif Error Requires Automatic Dismissal of Indictment, Jan. 15, 2021. Felon in Possession Statute, Pro Se Issues, Knowingly and Voluntarily Made.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.