Byrd v. Collins, No. 96-3209 (6th Cir.) (209 F.3d 486) (April 6, 2000) (Judge Richard F. Suhrheinrich)
Loaded on May 1, 2000
published in Punch and Jurists
May 22, 2000
Filed under:
Due Process,
Punch And Jurists.
This case is noted for Judge Jones’ brilliant dissent in which he decried the “intolerable abandonment of substantive and procedural principles” that appears prevalent in so many capital cases.
Judge Nathaniel Jones’ dissenting opinion in this case was a fitting culmination to the raft of stories and studies that appeared ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Hamilton, No. 97-50540 (9th Cir.) (208 F.3d 1165) (March 24, 2000) (Judge Samuel P. King)
- Ramdass v. Angelone, No. 99-7000 (U.S. Supreme Court) (530 U.S. 156; 120 S.Ct. 2113) (June 12, 2000) (Justice Kennedy)
- Payne v. U.S., No. Cov. H-93-1738 (S.D.Tex.) (91 F.Supp.2d 1014) (March 19, 1999) (Judge Vanessa D. Gilmore)
- U.S. v. Mason, No. CRIM. 99-162(RWR) (D.D.C.) (90 F.Supp.2d 1) (December 22, 1999) (Judge Richard W. Roberts)
- U.S. v. Hardin, No. 99-1175 (7th Cir.) (209 F.3d 652) (March 30, 2000) (Judge Terrence T. Evans)
- U.S. v. Humphrey, No. 98-8001 (10th Cir.) (208 F.3d 1190) (April 4, 2000) (Judge William J. Jr. Holloway)
- U.S. v. Nachamie, No. S2 98 CR. 1238(SAS) (S.D.N.Y.) (91 F.Supp.2d 552) (January 6, 2000) (Judge Shira A. Scheindlin)
- U.S. v. Hardin, No. 99-1175 (7th Cir.) (209 F.3d 652) (March 30, 2000) (Judge Terrence T. Evans)
- U.S. v. Torres-Rosa, No. 98-2250 (1st Cir.) (209 F.3d 4) (March 27, 2000) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Laden, No. S^ 98 CRIM. 1023 LBS (S.D.N.Y.) (91 F.Supp.2d 600) (March 30, 2000) (Judge Leonard B. Sand)
- U.S. v. Cruz-Guevara, No. 99-3043 (7th Cir.) (209 F.3d 644) (March 23, 2000) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- U.S. v. Harrison, No. 99-10496 (9th Cir.) (213 F.3d 1206) (May 30, 2000) (Judge Robert J. Kelleher)
- Cook v. Wiley, No. 98-6273 (11th Cir.) (208 F.3d 1314) (April 14, 2000) (Judge Edward E. Carnes)
- Byrd v. Collins, No. 96-3209 (6th Cir.) (209 F.3d 486) (April 6, 2000) (Judge Richard F. Suhrheinrich)
- Byrd v. Collins, No. 96-3209 (6th Cir.) (209 F.3d 486) (April 6, 2000) (Judge Richard F. Suhrheinrich)
- Carter v. U.S., No. 99-5716 (U.S. Supreme Court) (530 U.S. 255; 120 S.Ct. 2159) (June 12, 2000) (Justice Thomas)
- In Re Rashid, No. 95-cv-04243 (3rd Cir.) (210 F.3d 201) (April 14, 2000) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Torres, No. 99-1149 (3rd Cir.) (209 F.3d 308) (April 6, 2000) (Judge Maryanne Trump Barry)
- U.S. v. Freeman, No. 98-6636 (6th Cir.) (209 F.3d 464) (March 23, 2000) (Judge Boyce F. Jr. Martin)
More from these topics:
- Lawsuit Over Mailroom Abuses by Washington DOC Leads to Policy Changes, June 1, 2024. Retaliation for Litigating, Retaliation for Filing Grievances, Photos, Sexually Explicit Materials, Mail Regulations, Due Process, Legal Mail.
- Misadventures in Mail Censorship, Jan. 1, 2024. Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Grievances, Mail, Publications/Books, Mail Regulations, Due Process, Censorship, Prison Regulations.
- Eleventh Circuit Addresses First Amendment, Due Process Interests in Georgia Prisoner Emails, Jan. 1, 2024. Electronic Monitoring, Qualified Immunity, Due Process, First Amendment, rights, Attorney Misconduct/Disqualification, Email and IP Addresses, Prison Mail, Legitimate Penological Interests.
- Federal Judge Says Alaska DOC Policy Rejecting Prisoner Mail Without Notice Violates Due Process, Nov. 30, 2022. Due Process.
- Mailbox Rule Inapplicable to Prisoners Represented by Counsel, Oct. 1, 2021. Due Process, Legal Mail, Periods of Delay, Self-representation.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.