U.S. v. Woodrum, No. 99-1697 (1st Cir.) (208 F.3d 8) (April 6, 2000) (Per Curiam)
As stated by Judge Lynch, in her dissent: "[This] the case has great constitutional and societal significance . . . . [I]t is an important one, not just for the development of Fourth Amendment law, but also for the quality of life in urban areas and the protection of individual ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login