Skip navigation

U.S. v. Woodrum, No. 99-1697 (1st Cir.) (208 F.3d 8) (April 6, 2000) (Per Curiam)

As stated by Judge Lynch, in her dissent: "[This] the case has great constitutional and societal significance . . . . [I]t is an important one, not just for the development of Fourth Amendment law, but also for the quality of life in urban areas and the protection of individual …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login