Skip navigation

U.S. v. Havvard, No. IP00-0043-CR-01-H/F (S.D.Ind.) (117 F.Supp.2d 848) (October 5, 2000) (Judge David F. Hamilton)

Here the court admitted latent fingerprint evidence testimony, holding that it is so reliable that it is “the very archetype of reliable expert testimony” under the Daubert standard - a statement that may not be supported by the scientific commumity.

The defendant in this case was charged with being a ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login