Doe v. U.S., No. Civ.A. 99-912 (D.N.J.) (112 F.Supp.2d 398) (August 23, 2000) (Judge Alfred M. Wolin)
Here, the district court permitted an amendment, filed beyond the one-year statute of limitations, of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255, implicitly finding that the petitioner's Apprendi claim was timely because it asserted a right "newly recognized by the Supreme Court and ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login