U.S. v. Valdez, No. 99-3248 (10th Cir.) (225 F.3d 1137) (August 29, 2000) (Judge Robert H. Henry)
This is one of those flim-flam sentencing decisions involving that special brand of “now-you-see-it-now-you-don’t” evidence that exists only at sentencing and only in America. The decision is particularly noted because it helps to put into sharp focus the concept that evidence not good enough for the jury can still be ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login