Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Valensia, No. 99-10170 (9th Cir.) (222 F.3d 1173) (August 1, 2000) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon)

Loaded on Oct. 1, 2000 published in Punch and Jurists October 02, 2000
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Burden of Proof.

This case dealt with the burden of proof required under the Guidelines in light of Apprendi. In a detailed analysis of that issue, the Ninth Circuit concluded that "[w]hile we have recognized that the Due Process Clause requires the application of a clear and convincing evidence standard when an enhancement ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Doggett, No. 99-50380 (5th Cir.) (230 F.3d 160) (October 6, 2000) (Judge Fortunato P. Benavides)
  2. U.S. v. Corrado, No. 98-2315 (6th Cir.) (227 F.3d 543) (September 27, 2000) (Judge Harry W. Wellford)
  3. U.S. v. Valensia, No. 99-10170 (9th Cir.) (222 F.3d 1173) (August 1, 2000) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon)
  4. U.S. v. Dusenbery, No. 99-3148 (6th Cir.) (223 F.3d 422) (July 10, 2000) (Per Curiam)
  5. U.S. v. Keith, No. 99-50692 (5th Cir.) (230 F.3d 784) (October 17, 2000) (Per Curiam)
  6. U.S. v. Stout, No. 00-CR-20015 (C.D.Ill.) (109 F.Supp.2d 982) (August 9, 2000) (Judge Michael Patrick McCuskey)
  7. U.S. v. Bradley, No. 98-30149 (S.D.Ill.) (109 F.Supp.2d 984) (August 28, 2000) (Judge Richard Mills)
  8. U.S. v. Powell, No. CRIM. A. 99-719 (E.D.Pa.) (109 F.Supp.2d 381) (August 10, 2000) (Judge Eduardo C. Robreno)
  9. U.S. v. Zapata-Ibarra, No. 99-50156 (5th Cir.) (223 F.3d 281) (August 10, 2000) (Judge Will L. Garwood)

More from these topics: