Hutto v. Ross, No. 75-1726 (U.S. Supreme Court) (429 U.S. 28; 97 S.Ct. 202) (November 1, 1976) (Per Curiam)
Here the Court held that respondent's confession was not per se inadmissible as being involuntary merely because it was made as a result of an agreed-upon but unexecuted plea bargain that did not call for such a confession.
In this case the Court stated: "The only question in this case ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login