Ruiz v. U.S., No. 99-20228 (5th Cir.) (243 F.3d 941) (March 20, 2001) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)
Loaded on April 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
April 23, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Consent Decrees - Termination of.
Here the Court reversed Judge Justice's decision reported at 37 F.Supp.2d 855 holding that the termination provisions of the PLRA were unconstitutional because they violated the separation of powers and due process provisions of the Constitution.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Rogers v. Tennessee, No. 99-6218 (U.S. Supreme Court) (532 U.S. 451; 121 S.Ct. 1693) (May 14, 2001) (Justice O'Connor)
- U.S. v. Oakland Cannabis Buyer's Cooperative, et al., No. 00-151 (U.S. Supreme Court) (532 U.S. 483; 121 S.Ct. 1711) (May 14, 2001) (Justice Thomas)
- U.S. v. McWaine, No. 99-60265 (5th Cir.) (243 F.3d 871) (January 12, 2001) (Judge W. Eugene Davis)
- Fryer v. U.S., No. 98-4078 (7th Cir.) (243 F.3d 1004) (March 2, 2001) (Judge Harlington Jr. Wood)
- U.S. v. Nappi, No. 99-6126 (3rd Cir.) (243 F.3d 758) (March 21, 2001) (Judge Marjorie O. Rendell)
- Ruiz v. U.S., No. 99-20228 (5th Cir.) (243 F.3d 941) (March 20, 2001) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)
- U.S. v. Farese, No. 98-4909 (11th Cir.) (248 F.3d 1056) (April 16, 2001) (Judge Edward E. Carnes)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 99-4253 (7th Cir.) (250 F.3d 1073) (May 8, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Scott, No. 99-3182 (8th Cir.) (243 F.3d 1103) (March 23, 2001) (Judge James B. Loken)
- U.S. v. Norris, No. 97 CR 705-01 (E.D.N.Y.) (143 F.Supp.2d 243) (April 28, 2001) (Judge Eugene H. Nickerson)
- U.S. v. Mitchell, No. 99-4272 (6th Cir.) (243 F.3d 953) (March 19, 2001) (Judge Boyce F. Jr. Martin)
- U.S. v. Buckowich, No. 99-4105 (7th Cir.) (243 F.3d 1081) (March 22, 2001) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
- U.S. v. Akins, No. 99-30241 (9th Cir.) (243 F.3d 1199) (March 27, 2001) (Judge Dorothy Wright Nelson)
- U.S. v. Harbin, No. 99-3255 (7th Cir.) (250 F.3d 532) (May 8, 2001) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
- Cone v. Bell, No. 99-5279 (6th Cir.) (243 F.3d 961) (March 22, 2001) (Judge James L. Ryan)
More from these topics:
- Ninth Circuit Shuts Down Settlement Agreement in Long-Running California Prisoners’ Gang Affiliation Suit, March 1, 2024. Gang Policies, Prison Gangs, Informants (Disciplinary Hearings), Informants, Consent Decrees, Control Units/SHU/Solitary Confinement, Consent Decrees - Termination of.
- Third Circuit Joins Fifth, Tenth and D.C. Circuits in Holding Heck Favorable-Termination Dismissals Are PLRA Strikes, June 1, 2022. Consent Decrees - Termination of.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.