U.S. v. Buckowich, No. 99-4105 (7th Cir.) (243 F.3d 1081) (March 22, 2001) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
Loaded on April 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
April 23, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Applicable Guidelines Issues.
This case involved a defendant who argued that the court should disregard her conviction for money laundering on the grounds that it was atypical money laundering conduct; and that her sentence should be based strictly on the fraud guideline, since that Guideline reflected more closely the underlying criminal conduct. In …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Rogers v. Tennessee, No. 99-6218 (U.S. Supreme Court) (532 U.S. 451; 121 S.Ct. 1693) (May 14, 2001) (Justice O'Connor)
- U.S. v. Oakland Cannabis Buyer's Cooperative, et al., No. 00-151 (U.S. Supreme Court) (532 U.S. 483; 121 S.Ct. 1711) (May 14, 2001) (Justice Thomas)
- U.S. v. Akins, No. 99-30241 (9th Cir.) (243 F.3d 1199) (March 27, 2001) (Judge Dorothy Wright Nelson)
- U.S. v. Buckowich, No. 99-4105 (7th Cir.) (243 F.3d 1081) (March 22, 2001) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
- U.S. v. Mitchell, No. 99-4272 (6th Cir.) (243 F.3d 953) (March 19, 2001) (Judge Boyce F. Jr. Martin)
- U.S. v. Norris, No. 97 CR 705-01 (E.D.N.Y.) (143 F.Supp.2d 243) (April 28, 2001) (Judge Eugene H. Nickerson)
- U.S. v. Scott, No. 99-3182 (8th Cir.) (243 F.3d 1103) (March 23, 2001) (Judge James B. Loken)
- U.S. v. Harbin, No. 99-3255 (7th Cir.) (250 F.3d 532) (May 8, 2001) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
- U.S. v. Farese, No. 98-4909 (11th Cir.) (248 F.3d 1056) (April 16, 2001) (Judge Edward E. Carnes)
- Ruiz v. U.S., No. 99-20228 (5th Cir.) (243 F.3d 941) (March 20, 2001) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)
- U.S. v. Nappi, No. 99-6126 (3rd Cir.) (243 F.3d 758) (March 21, 2001) (Judge Marjorie O. Rendell)
- Fryer v. U.S., No. 98-4078 (7th Cir.) (243 F.3d 1004) (March 2, 2001) (Judge Harlington Jr. Wood)
- U.S. v. McWaine, No. 99-60265 (5th Cir.) (243 F.3d 871) (January 12, 2001) (Judge W. Eugene Davis)
- Cone v. Bell, No. 99-5279 (6th Cir.) (243 F.3d 961) (March 22, 2001) (Judge James L. Ryan)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 99-4253 (7th Cir.) (250 F.3d 1073) (May 8, 2001) (Per Curiam)
More from these topics:
- Fourth Circuit: A Finding of Offering Money to Minor for Videos Depicting Specific Conduct Without Establishing Order of Events Insufficient to Establish Offer ‘Caused’ Minor to Produce Explicit Material Within Meaning of Guidelines § 2G2.2(c)(1) Cros, July 1, 2025. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Applicable Guidelines Issues.
- Ninth Circuit Announces District Courts Must Either Orally Pronounce All Discretionary ‘Standard’ Conditions of Supervised Release in the Presence of Defendant or Provide Conditions in Writing Prior to Sentencing, Feb. 15, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Applicable Guidelines Issues, Sentencing Hearing, Right to be Present, Conditions of, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.