Skip navigation

U.S. v. Mitchell, No. 99-4272 (6th Cir.) (243 F.3d 953) (March 19, 2001) (Judge Boyce F. Jr. Martin)

In holding that the district court's failure to comply with Rule 32(c)(3)(A) of the Fed.R.Crim.P. required a remand for a new sentencing, the Court rejected the Government's argument that the defendant had to show actual prejudice as a result of the error before he could get a new sentencing. Citing ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login