Skip navigation

U.S. v. Real Property in Section 9, No. 98-2261 (6th Cir.) (241 F.3d 796) (March 1, 2001) (Judge Gilbert S. Merritt)

Here the Court addressed the retroactive application of the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act and held that since the purpose of the Act was "to rectify unfairness and level the playing field" it would be manifestly unjust not to apply it retrospectively.

This is one of the first cases to ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login