U.S. v. Smith, No. 99-4253 (7th Cir.) (250 F.3d 1073) (May 8, 2001) (Per Curiam)
Loaded on April 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
April 23, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Procedural Default/Error.
In January, 2001, some three months after the Supreme Court vacated Anthony Smith’s original 405-month sentence in this drug case and remanded the case back to the Seventh Circuit for reconsideration in light of its ruling in Apprendi v. New Jersey, a panel from the Seventh Circuit simply reaffirmed the ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Rogers v. Tennessee, No. 99-6218 (U.S. Supreme Court) (532 U.S. 451; 121 S.Ct. 1693) (May 14, 2001) (Justice O'Connor)
- U.S. v. Oakland Cannabis Buyer's Cooperative, et al., No. 00-151 (U.S. Supreme Court) (532 U.S. 483; 121 S.Ct. 1711) (May 14, 2001) (Justice Thomas)
- U.S. v. McWaine, No. 99-60265 (5th Cir.) (243 F.3d 871) (January 12, 2001) (Judge W. Eugene Davis)
- Fryer v. U.S., No. 98-4078 (7th Cir.) (243 F.3d 1004) (March 2, 2001) (Judge Harlington Jr. Wood)
- U.S. v. Nappi, No. 99-6126 (3rd Cir.) (243 F.3d 758) (March 21, 2001) (Judge Marjorie O. Rendell)
- Ruiz v. U.S., No. 99-20228 (5th Cir.) (243 F.3d 941) (March 20, 2001) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)
- U.S. v. Farese, No. 98-4909 (11th Cir.) (248 F.3d 1056) (April 16, 2001) (Judge Edward E. Carnes)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 99-4253 (7th Cir.) (250 F.3d 1073) (May 8, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Scott, No. 99-3182 (8th Cir.) (243 F.3d 1103) (March 23, 2001) (Judge James B. Loken)
- U.S. v. Norris, No. 97 CR 705-01 (E.D.N.Y.) (143 F.Supp.2d 243) (April 28, 2001) (Judge Eugene H. Nickerson)
- U.S. v. Mitchell, No. 99-4272 (6th Cir.) (243 F.3d 953) (March 19, 2001) (Judge Boyce F. Jr. Martin)
- U.S. v. Buckowich, No. 99-4105 (7th Cir.) (243 F.3d 1081) (March 22, 2001) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
- U.S. v. Akins, No. 99-30241 (9th Cir.) (243 F.3d 1199) (March 27, 2001) (Judge Dorothy Wright Nelson)
- U.S. v. Harbin, No. 99-3255 (7th Cir.) (250 F.3d 532) (May 8, 2001) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
- Cone v. Bell, No. 99-5279 (6th Cir.) (243 F.3d 961) (March 22, 2001) (Judge James L. Ryan)
More from these topics:
- Kansas Supreme Court Announces Complete and Wrongful Denial of Defendant’s Constitutional Right to Testify Constitutes ‘Structural Error’ and Reverses Convictions Where Defendant Removed From Stand and Entire Testimony Stricken, Oct. 1, 2024. Procedural Default/Error, Right to Testify, Right to Testify/Remain Silent.
- U.S. Supreme Court Apparently Prioritizes Ideology Over Guilt or Innocence, Jan. 15, 2024. AEDPA, Procedural Default/Error, Proving Cause, Capital Cases, Procedural Error, Effective Assistance of Counsel, Counsel - Right to, Counsel - Effective Assistance of, Strickland Standard, Per se ineffectiveness, Right to Counsel.
- Third Circuit Vacates Denial of First Step Act Relief Because District Court’s Failure to Expressly Identify Which § 841(b) Provision Supported Sentence Precludes Appellate Review, Oct. 1, 2023. First Step Act, Procedural Default/Error, Resentencing.
- SCOTUS Announces Statute of Limitations for § 1983 Claim Challenging State’s Postconviction DNA Testing Procedures Begins to Run Upon Completion of State-Court Litigation, Including Appeals, May 15, 2023. DNA Testing/Samples, Procedural Default/Error.
- Seventh Circuit Vacates Federal Drug Conspiracy Conviction Because District Court Failed to Ensure Defendant Understood ‘Agreement’ Element of Conspiracy and Failed to Ensure Factual Basis for Guilty Plea, April 15, 2023. Procedural Default/Error, Conspiracies, Attempts, Solicitations, Knowingly and Voluntarily Made.
- Seventh Circuit: District Court’s Failure to Address Nonfrivolous Argument Raised in First Step Act Motion Constitutes Procedural Error in Violation of Concepcion, April 15, 2023. Frivolous Litigation (PLRA), First Step Act, Procedural Default/Error.
- SCOTUS: Arizona Supreme Court’s Interpretation of State Procedural Rule so ‘Novel and Unforeseeable’ It’s Not ‘Adequate’ to Preclude SCOTUS Review of Federal Death-Penalty Claim, March 15, 2023. Death Penalty, Procedural Default/Error.
- Fifth Circuit: District Court Erred in Finding That a Fourth Amendment Stop Did Not Occur, Jan. 15, 2023. Procedural Default/Error, Terry Stops.
- Florida Supreme Court: Trial Courts Have Authority to Correct Sentencing Errors, But Subject to Time Limits, Jan. 1, 2023. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Procedural Default/Error, Timeliness.
- Fifth Circuit: New, Retroactive Supreme Court Decision Allowing SOS Habeas Petition Not New Enough to Avoid Procedural-Default Bar, Sept. 15, 2022. AEDPA, Procedural Default/Error.