Skip navigation

U.S. v. Antonakeas, No. 99-10002 (9th Cir.) (255 F.3d 714) (June 19, 2001) (Judge Proctor Jr. Hug)

In this decision, the panel held that the Apprendi rule does not apply to the imposition of mandatory minimum sentences - a decision that appears to have ignored another panel's decision in U.S. v. Velasco-Heredia, 249 F.3d 963.

In this case, the Ninth Circuit held that the Apprendi rule does ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login