U.S. v. Austin, No. 00-2933 (8th Cir.) (255 F.3d 593) (June 18, 2001) (Judge Paul A. Magnuson)
Loaded on Aug. 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
August 13, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Burden of Proof.
Here the Court held that any Apprendi challenge to the imposition of a two-level leadership enhancement was "categoricaly barred" where that enhancement did not lead to the imposition of a sentence above the prescribed statutory maximum.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Descally, No. 99-4232 (11th Cir.) (254 F.3d 1328) (June 28, 2001) (Judge Myron H. Bright)
- U.S. v. Austin, No. 00-2933 (8th Cir.) (255 F.3d 593) (June 18, 2001) (Judge Paul A. Magnuson)
- Smith v. Zachary, No. 99-4084 (7th Cir.) (255 F.3d 466) (June 28, 2001) (Judge Terrence T. Evans)
- U.S. v. Gomez, No. 00-2249 (1st Cir.) (255 F.3d 31) (July 6, 2001) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. King, No. 00-3023 (D.C. Cir.) (254 F.3d 1098) (July 3, 2001) (Judge Douglas Ginsburg)
- Moore v. Morton, No. 98-5429 (3rd Cir.) (255 F.3d 95) (June 22, 2001) (Judge Anthony J. Scirica)
- U.S. v. Williams, No. 92 CR 1131 (E.D.N.Y.) (146 F.Supp.2d 249) (May 30, 2001) (Judge I. Leo Glasser)
- U.S. v. Baptiste, No. 99-31027 (5th Cir.) (264 F.3d 578) (August 31, 2001) (Judge Edith H. Jones)
- U.S. v. Cabeza, No. 00-14583 (11th Cir.) (258 F.3d 1256) (July 25, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Shabazz, No. 99-2388 (6th Cir.) (263 F.3d 603) (August 30, 2001) (Judge Alice M. Batchelder)
- U.S. v. Arrington, No. 00-3096 (8th Cir.) (255 F.3d 637) (June 28, 2001) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Gilliam, No. 00-2887 (7th Cir.) (255 F.3d 428) (June 28, 2001) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
- U.S. v. Antonakeas, No. 99-10002 (9th Cir.) (255 F.3d 714) (June 19, 2001) (Judge Proctor Jr. Hug)
- U.S. v. Caldwell, No. 98-2871 (8th Cir.) (255 F.3d 532) (July 6, 2001) (Per Curiam)
More from these topics:
- Ohio Supreme Court: Amendment to Statute That Shifts Burden of Proof to State Regarding Self-Defense Applies to All Pending and New Trials After Effective Date, Regardless of When Alleged Crime Occurred, Sept. 15, 2022. Retroactivity, Burden of Proof.
- Seventh Circuit Vacates Sentence Because Government Failed to Meet Its Burden to Support Uncharged Drug Quantity Under Rule 32, Aug. 9, 2022. Burden of Proof, Drugs - Determination of.
- Colorado Supreme Court Announces ‘Reasonable Likelihood’ Framework for Determining Whether Trial Court’s Comments to Prospective Jurors Lowered Prosecution’s Burden of Proof, July 15, 2022. Jury Instructions in Jury Room, Burden of Proof, Improper Comment.
- South Carolina Supreme Court Rejects U.S. Supreme Court’s Shifting of Burden to Defendant to Prove Absence of Exigent Circumstances in DUI Cases, June 15, 2020. Exigent Circumstances, Warrantless Searches, Burden of Proof.
- Fifth Circuit Finds IAC for Failure to Object to Court’s Jury Instructions that Constructively Amended Indictment by Lowering Government’s Burden of Proof, May 15, 2020. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Jurors and Juries, Burden of Proof.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.