Skip navigation

U.S. v. Humber, No. 00-11054 (11th Cir.) (255 F.3d 1308) (July 5, 2001) (Judge James C. Hill)

As explained by the Court, this appeal presented "a simple question of first impression in this circuit and apparently all others under the sentencing guidelines: can a defendant who pleads guilty to eighty-three counts of bank fraud, money laundering, forfeiture and tax evasion, involving more than $ 18,000,000 in embezzled ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login