U.S. v. Sullivan, No. 00-8012 (10th Cir.) (255 F.3d 1256) (July 11, 2001) (Judge Stephen H. Anderson)
Loaded on Aug. 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
August 20, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Burden of Proof.
The Court held that the Apprendi rule did not apply to sentencing factors (such as the loss calculations in the instant tax case under USSG § 2T1.1(c)(2)) that increased the defendant's guideline sentencing range but not his prescribed statutory maximum.
In this case the Court held that Apprendi "does not …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Barrios-Gutierrez, No. 99-10148 (9th Cir.) (255 F.3d 1024) (July 3, 2001) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)
- U.S. v. Delgado, No. 99-50635 (5th Cir.) (256 F.3d 264) (June 26, 2001) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
- U.S. v. Watts, No. 00-4008 (7th Cir.) (256 F.3d 630) (July 5, 2001) (Judge Richard D. Cudahy)
- Delaney v. DeTella, No. 00-4145 (7th Cir.) (256 F.3d 679) (July 9, 2001) (Judge Terrence T. Evans)
- U.S. v. Butch, No. 99-5738 (3rd Cir.) (256 F.3d 171) (June 29, 2001) (Judge Thomas L. Ambro)
- Gomez v. Vernon, No. 99-35930 (9th Cir.) (255 F.3d 1118) (July 10, 2001) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown)
- U.S. v. Manoocher Nosrati-Shamloo, No. 99-10197 (11th Cir.) (255 F.3d 1290) (July 3, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Sebaggala, No. 99-1349 (1st Cir.) (256 F.3d 59) (July 16, 2001) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Barrios-Gutierrez, No. 99-10148 (9th Cir.) (255 F.3d 1024) (July 3, 2001) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)
- U.S. v. Pressler, No. 00-1824 (3rd Cir.) (256 F.3d 144) (July 2, 2001) (Judge Edward R. Becker)
- U.S. v. Sullivan, No. 00-8012 (10th Cir.) (255 F.3d 1256) (July 11, 2001) (Judge Stephen H. Anderson)
- U.S. v. Clinton, No. 99-30253 (5th Cir.) (256 F.3d 311) (June 27, 2001) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
- U.S. v. Stewart, No. 98-4155 (4th Cir.) (256 F.3d 231) (July 6, 2001) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- U.S. v. McCulligan, No. 00-2562 (3rd Cir.) (256 F.3d 97) (July 6, 2001) (Judge Maryanne Trump Barry)
- U.S. v. Childs, No. 00-3111 (7th Cir.) (256 F.3d 559) (July 3, 2001) (Judge Richard D. Cudahy)
- U.S. v. Price, No. 99-7078 (10th Cir.) (265 F.3d 1097) (September 11, 2001) (Judge Michael R. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Ochoa-Gaytan, No. 99-50366 (9th Cir.) (265 F.3d 837) (September 7, 2001) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher)
- U.S. v. Jimenez, No. 00-50323 (5th Cir.) (256 F.3d 330) (June 29, 2001) (Judge Keith P. Ellison)
- U.S. v. Humber, No. 00-11054 (11th Cir.) (255 F.3d 1308) (July 5, 2001) (Judge James C. Hill)
- U.S. v. Cernobyl, No. 00-7033 (10th Cir.) (255 F.3d 1215) (June 29, 2001) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- U.S. v. Nguyen, No. 98-9334 (11th Cir.) (255 F.3d 1335) (July 6, 2001) (Judge Emmett Ripley Cox)
More from these topics:
- Ohio Supreme Court: Amendment to Statute That Shifts Burden of Proof to State Regarding Self-Defense Applies to All Pending and New Trials After Effective Date, Regardless of When Alleged Crime Occurred, Sept. 15, 2022. Retroactivity, Burden of Proof.
- Seventh Circuit Vacates Sentence Because Government Failed to Meet Its Burden to Support Uncharged Drug Quantity Under Rule 32, Aug. 9, 2022. Burden of Proof, Drugs - Determination of.
- Colorado Supreme Court Announces ‘Reasonable Likelihood’ Framework for Determining Whether Trial Court’s Comments to Prospective Jurors Lowered Prosecution’s Burden of Proof, July 15, 2022. Jury Instructions in Jury Room, Burden of Proof, Improper Comment.
- South Carolina Supreme Court Rejects U.S. Supreme Court’s Shifting of Burden to Defendant to Prove Absence of Exigent Circumstances in DUI Cases, June 15, 2020. Exigent Circumstances, Warrantless Searches, Burden of Proof.
- Fifth Circuit Finds IAC for Failure to Object to Court’s Jury Instructions that Constructively Amended Indictment by Lowering Government’s Burden of Proof, May 15, 2020. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Jurors and Juries, Burden of Proof.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.