Gibson v. U.S., No. 99-6382 (6th Cir.) (271 F.3d 247) (November 6, 2001) (Judge Algenon L. Marbley)
Loaded on Dec. 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
December 10, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Mandatory Minimums.
The petitioner/defendant in this case was convicted of manufacturing and possessing marijuana with intent to distribute; and the district court imposed a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years based on its determination that the defendant had grown more than 1000 marijuana plants when the jury made no determination as to …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Guevara, No. 00-1133 (2nd Cir.) (277 F.3d 111) (December 18, 2001) (Judge Dennis G. Jacobs)
- Patel v. Zemski, No. 01-2398 (3rd Cir.) (275 F.3d 299) (December 19, 2001) (Judge Dolores K. Sloviter)
- Richman v. Sheahan, No. 00-2173 (7th Cir.) (270 F.3d 430) (October 16, 2001) (Judge Ann Claire Williams)
- Martinez v. City of Oxnard, No. 00-546520 (9th Cir.) (270 F.3d 852) (October 30, 2001) (Judge Richard C. Tallman)
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 00-3050 (D.C. Cir.) (270 F.3d 977) (November 5, 2001) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)
- U.S. v. Burgos, No. 00-13779 (11th Cir.) (276 F.3d 1284) (December 21, 2001) (Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat)
- U.S. v. Taylor, No. 00-30936 (5th Cir.) (277 F.3d 721) (December 21, 2001) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
- U.S. v. McElhiney, No. 00-3056 (10th Cir.) (275 F.3d 928) (December 28, 2001) (Judge Robert H. Henry)
- U.S. v. Ford, No. 99-15208 (11th Cir.) (270 F.3d 1346) (October 25, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Echavarria-Escobar, No. 00-10570 (9th Cir.) (270 F.3d 1265) (October 18, 2001) (Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw)
- Gibson v. U.S., No. 99-6382 (6th Cir.) (271 F.3d 247) (November 6, 2001) (Judge Algenon L. Marbley)
- U.S. v. Campbell, No. 01-1485 (8th Cir.) (270 F.3d 702) (October 29, 2001) (Judge Donald P. Lay)
- U.S. v. De Leon, No. 00-2372 (1st Cir.) (270 F.3d 90) (November 2, 2001) (Judge Michael Boudin)
- U.S. v. Bailey, No. 01-1058 (1st Cir.) (270 F.3d 83) (November 2, 2001) (Judge Robert G. Doumar)
- U.S. v. DeLuca, No. 00-1442 (10th Cir.) (269 F.3d 1128) (October 25, 2001) (Judge Paul J. Jr. Kelly)
- Doan v. Watson, No. NA 99-4-C-B/S (S.D.Ind.) (168 F.Supp.2d 832) (October 10, 2001) (Judge Sarah Evans Barker)
- Herrera v. U.S., No. CV 01-1015(RR) (E.D.N.Y.) (169 F.Supp.2d 92) (July 25, 2001) (Judge Reena Raggi)
More from these topics:
- Rikers Island Staffers, Contractor and Detainee Sentenced for Smuggling, May 1, 2025. War on Drugs, Drug Mixtures/Purity, Mandatory Minimums.
- Fifth Circuit: District Court Miscalculated Sentencing Guidelines Range by Implausibly Finding Defendant Would Use All Cash Proceeds of Drug Sales Seized to Purchase More Meth to Resell, July 15, 2022. War on Drugs, Mandatory Minimums.
- Second Circuit: District Court Required to Explain Rationale for Reducing Sentence to ‘Time Served’ Under First Step Act but Refused to Reduce Supervised Release Portion of Sentence Despite Being Longer Than New Mandatory Minimum, March 15, 2022. First Step Act, Probation, Parole & Supervised Release, Mandatory Minimums.
- SCOTUS: § 2(a) of Fair Sentencing Act Modifies Statutory Penalties Only for Subparagraphs (A) and (B) of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)— the Mandatory-Minimum Provisions, Sept. 15, 2021. Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, Mandatory Minimums.
- Federal Judge: ‘Offense of Conviction’ Under Guidelines Excludes Relevant Conduct for Sentencing, Sept. 15, 2021. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Mandatory Minimums.
- Session’s Directive to Seek Harshest Sentencing Rescinded, Feb. 16, 2021. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Mandatory Minimums.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.