Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Buckland, No. 99-30285 (9th Cir.) (277 F.3d 1173) (January 18, 2002) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)

Loaded on Dec. 1, 2001 published in Punch and Jurists December 31, 2001
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Constitutional Challenges.

Here a divided en banc court from the Ninth Circuit reversed a prior panel’s controversial decision and held that Apprendi did not render the provisions of the Government’s principal drug enforcement statute, 21 U.S.C. § 841, facially unconstitutional.

Last summer, a panel from the Ninth Circuit infuriated threw Federal prosecutors ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Sabbeth, No. 00-1586 (2nd Cir.) (277 F.3d 94) (January 11, 2002) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
  2. U.S. v. Buckland, No. 99-30285 (9th Cir.) (277 F.3d 1173) (January 18, 2002) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)
  3. U.S. v. McIntosh, No. 00-50966 (5th Cir.) (280 F.3d 479) (January 16, 2002) (Judge Rhesa Hawkins Barksdale)
  4. U.S. v. Arvizu, No. 00-1519 (U.S. Supreme Court) (534 U.S. 266; 122 S.Ct. 744) (January 15, 2002) (Justice Rehnquist)
  5. U.S. v. LaCarubba, No. 01-CR-10033 (D.Mass.) (184 F.Supp.2d 89) (January 4, 2002) (Judge Nancy Gertner)

More from these topics: