Skip navigation

Jackson v. U.S., No. 95-50029 (E.D.Mich.) (129 F.Supp.2d 1053) (December 20, 2000) (Judge Paul V. Gadola)

In this case, Judge Gadola held that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Apprendi v. New Jersey applies retroactively to initial § 2255 motions for three reasons. First, on the basis of statutory construction, the Court concluded that the juxtaposition of provisions added by Congress to the text of § 2255 ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login