Mickens v. Taylor, No. 00-4 (4th Cir.) (240 F.3d 348) (February 16, 2001) (Judge H. Emory Jr. Widener)
Loaded on Feb. 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
February 19, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Conflict of Interest.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Shepard, No. 98-10262-NG (D.Mass.) (125 F.Supp.2d 562) (January 20, 2000) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
- U.S. v. Robinson, No. 00-1674 (1st Cir.) (241 F.3d 115) (March 6, 2001) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Neuhausser, No. 99-3763 (6th Cir.) (241 F.3d 460) (February 14, 2001) (Judge Gerald E. Rosen)
- U.S. v. Caba, No. 00-1493 (1st Cir.) (241 F.3d 98) (March 2, 2001) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- Mickens v. Taylor, No. 00-4 (4th Cir.) (240 F.3d 348) (February 16, 2001) (Judge H. Emory Jr. Widener)
- U.S. v. Peterson, No. 99-3967 (7th Cir.) (236 F.3d 848) (January 4, 2001) (Judge William J. Bauer)
- U.S. v. Harrison, No. 99-1642 (2nd Cir.) (241 F.3d 289) (March 5, 2001) (Judge Rosemary S. Pooler)
- U.S. v. Ochoa-Heredia, No. CR 99-4069-MBW (N.D.Iowa) (125 F.Supp.2d 892) (January 3, 2001) (Judge Mark W. Bennett)
- U.S. v. Westmoreland, No. 99-1491 (7th Cir.) (240 F.3d 618) (February 15, 2001) (Judge Richard D. Cudahy)
- U.S. v. Harrison, No. 99-1642 (2nd Cir.) (241 F.3d 289) (March 5, 2001) (Judge Rosemary S. Pooler)
- Jackson v. U.S., No. 95-50029 (E.D.Mich.) (129 F.Supp.2d 1053) (December 20, 2000) (Judge Paul V. Gadola)
- U.S. v. Carter, No. 99-5430 (6th Cir.) (236 F.3d 777) (January 18, 2001) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Ruiz, No. 00-50048 (9th Cir.) (241 F.3d 1157) (March 5, 2001) (Judge Robert Boochever)
- Burton v. U.S., No. 98-20294 (5th Cir.) (237 F.3d 490) (December 22, 2000) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Gibbs, No. Crim.A. 96-539-2 (E.D.Pa.) (125 F.Supp.2d 700) (December 19, 2000) (Judge Harvey III Bartle)
- U.S. v. McIntosh, No. 00-1035 (8th Cir.) (236 F.3d 968) (January 10, 2001) (Judge David R. Hansen)
- U.S. v. Riley, No. 98-3012EA (8th Cir.) (236 F.3d 982) (January 18, 2001) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
- U.S. v. Camarillo-Tello, No. 00-30029 (9th Cir.) (236 F.3d 1024) (January 3, 2001) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher)
- U.S. v. Ryan, No. 99-3366 (10th Cir.) (236 F.3d 1268) (January 10, 2001) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- U.S. v. Houle, No. 99-1310 (1st Cir.) (237 F.3d 71) (January 23, 2001) (Judge Salvador E. Casellas)
- U.S. v. Guzman, No. 99-2169 (7th Cir.) (236 F.3d 830) (January 3, 2001) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
More from these topics:
- Massachusetts Supreme Court: Defense Counsel’s Overt Bias Against Own Client Constitutes Actual Conflict of Interest Requiring New Trial Without Need to Prove Prejudice, Dec. 15, 2023. Counsel - Constructive denial of, Strickland Standard, Conflict of Interest, Disqualification of Counsel.
- Texas Prosecutor Spent 20-Year Career Also Working as Law Clerk to Judges He Appeared Before, May 5, 2022. Attorney Misconduct, Conflict of Interest.
- Arizona Supreme Court: Trial Court’s Failure to Protect Defendant’s Right to Conflict-Free Counsel May Be Raised on Direct Appeal 16 Massachusetts Supreme Court: Error to Exclude Expert Testimony on Significance of Tattoo to Support Claim of Self-Defense, Aug. 15, 2021. Appealable Issues/Orders, Conflict of Interest.
- D.C. Circuit: Conflicted Counsel During Habeas Proceeding Requires Appointment of Conflict-Free Counsel, June 15, 2021. Habeas Corpus, Conflict of Interest.
- "Kentucky Supreme Court: Hearing on Defense Counsel’s Fitness Is Critical Stage at Which Defendant Has Right to Be Present With Conflict-Free Counsel", March 15, 2021. Strickland Standard, Conflict of Interest.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.