U.S. v. Harrison, No. 99-1642 (2nd Cir.) (241 F.3d 289) (March 5, 2001) (Judge Rosemary S. Pooler)
Loaded on Feb. 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
February 19, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Mandatory Minimums.
Here the Court held that the enhanced sentence for drug violations involving at least 50 grams of cocaine base, as set forth in § 841(b)(1)(A), applies only to a single violation involving 50 grams or more, rather than aggregating multiple violations.
This case is noted for two reasons: First, the ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Shepard, No. 98-10262-NG (D.Mass.) (125 F.Supp.2d 562) (January 20, 2000) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
- U.S. v. Robinson, No. 00-1674 (1st Cir.) (241 F.3d 115) (March 6, 2001) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Neuhausser, No. 99-3763 (6th Cir.) (241 F.3d 460) (February 14, 2001) (Judge Gerald E. Rosen)
- U.S. v. Caba, No. 00-1493 (1st Cir.) (241 F.3d 98) (March 2, 2001) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- Mickens v. Taylor, No. 00-4 (4th Cir.) (240 F.3d 348) (February 16, 2001) (Judge H. Emory Jr. Widener)
- U.S. v. Peterson, No. 99-3967 (7th Cir.) (236 F.3d 848) (January 4, 2001) (Judge William J. Bauer)
- U.S. v. Harrison, No. 99-1642 (2nd Cir.) (241 F.3d 289) (March 5, 2001) (Judge Rosemary S. Pooler)
- U.S. v. Ochoa-Heredia, No. CR 99-4069-MBW (N.D.Iowa) (125 F.Supp.2d 892) (January 3, 2001) (Judge Mark W. Bennett)
- U.S. v. Westmoreland, No. 99-1491 (7th Cir.) (240 F.3d 618) (February 15, 2001) (Judge Richard D. Cudahy)
- U.S. v. Harrison, No. 99-1642 (2nd Cir.) (241 F.3d 289) (March 5, 2001) (Judge Rosemary S. Pooler)
- Jackson v. U.S., No. 95-50029 (E.D.Mich.) (129 F.Supp.2d 1053) (December 20, 2000) (Judge Paul V. Gadola)
- U.S. v. Carter, No. 99-5430 (6th Cir.) (236 F.3d 777) (January 18, 2001) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Ruiz, No. 00-50048 (9th Cir.) (241 F.3d 1157) (March 5, 2001) (Judge Robert Boochever)
- Burton v. U.S., No. 98-20294 (5th Cir.) (237 F.3d 490) (December 22, 2000) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Gibbs, No. Crim.A. 96-539-2 (E.D.Pa.) (125 F.Supp.2d 700) (December 19, 2000) (Judge Harvey III Bartle)
- U.S. v. McIntosh, No. 00-1035 (8th Cir.) (236 F.3d 968) (January 10, 2001) (Judge David R. Hansen)
- U.S. v. Riley, No. 98-3012EA (8th Cir.) (236 F.3d 982) (January 18, 2001) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
- U.S. v. Camarillo-Tello, No. 00-30029 (9th Cir.) (236 F.3d 1024) (January 3, 2001) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher)
- U.S. v. Ryan, No. 99-3366 (10th Cir.) (236 F.3d 1268) (January 10, 2001) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- U.S. v. Houle, No. 99-1310 (1st Cir.) (237 F.3d 71) (January 23, 2001) (Judge Salvador E. Casellas)
- U.S. v. Guzman, No. 99-2169 (7th Cir.) (236 F.3d 830) (January 3, 2001) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
More from these topics:
- Fifth Circuit: District Court Miscalculated Sentencing Guidelines Range by Implausibly Finding Defendant Would Use All Cash Proceeds of Drug Sales Seized to Purchase More Meth to Resell, July 15, 2022. War on Drugs, Mandatory Minimums.
- Second Circuit: District Court Required to Explain Rationale for Reducing Sentence to ‘Time Served’ Under First Step Act but Refused to Reduce Supervised Release Portion of Sentence Despite Being Longer Than New Mandatory Minimum, March 15, 2022. First Step Act, Probation, Parole & Supervised Release, Mandatory Minimums.
- SCOTUS: § 2(a) of Fair Sentencing Act Modifies Statutory Penalties Only for Subparagraphs (A) and (B) of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)— the Mandatory-Minimum Provisions, Sept. 15, 2021. Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, Mandatory Minimums.
- Federal Judge: ‘Offense of Conviction’ Under Guidelines Excludes Relevant Conduct for Sentencing, Sept. 15, 2021. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Mandatory Minimums.
- Session’s Directive to Seek Harshest Sentencing Rescinded, Feb. 16, 2021. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Mandatory Minimums.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.