Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Flowers v. Walter, No. 99-35552 (9th Cir.) (239 F.3d 1096) (February 9, 2001) (Per Curiam)

Loaded on Jan. 1, 2001 published in Punch and Jurists January 22, 2001
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

This is a significant habeas corpus decision in which the Court held that the Supreme Court does not have to expressly declare a new rule of law retroactive for purposes of the AEDPA's limitations on successive petitions if it is a "watershed" decision.

This is an intriguing decision which addresses ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Smith, No. 99-4253 (7th Cir.) (241 F.3d 546) (February 8, 2001) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
  2. U.S. v. Sadolsky, No. 99-5780 (6th Cir.) (234 F.3d 938) (December 11, 2000) (Judge Richard F. Suhrheinrich)
  3. U.S. v. Norris, No. 97 CR 705-01 (E.D.N.Y.) (128 F.Supp.2d 739) (February 1, 2001) (Judge Eugene H. Nickerson)
  4. U.S. v. Sturgis, No. 00-2584 (8th Cir.) (238 F.3d 956) (February 6, 2001) (Judge Kermit Edward Bye)
  5. Flowers v. Walter, No. 99-35552 (9th Cir.) (239 F.3d 1096) (February 9, 2001) (Per Curiam)
  6. U.S. v. Tran, No. 99-1278(L) (2nd Cir.) (234 F.3d 798) (November 15, 2000) (Judge Fred I. Parker)
  7. Baidas v. Jennings, No. Civ.A 00-CV-72003-DT (E.D.Mich.) (123 F.Supp.2d 1052) (December 6, 1999) (Judge Avern Levin Cohn)

More from these topics: