Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Meyer, No. 99-1919 (7th Cir.) (234 F.3d 319) (December 4, 2000) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)

Loaded on Jan. 1, 2001 published in Punch and Jurists January 08, 2001
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Burden of Proof.

Here the Court held that there was no due process violation when the sentencing court determined by a mere preponderance of the evidence that the defendant should be sentenced for first degree murder even though he had not been charged with that crime.

United States v. Munoz, 233 F.3d 1117 ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Ofcky, No. 00-1420 (7th Cir.) (237 F.3d 904) (January 23, 2001) (Judge Richard D. Cudahy)
  2. U.S. v. Lowe, No. CRIM A 3:00-00063 (S.D.W.Va.) (143 F.Supp.2d 613) (November 28, 2000) (Judge Joseph R. Goodwin)
  3. U.S. v. Salazar-Flores, No. 99-50956 (5th Cir.) (238 F.3d 672) (January 25, 2001) (Judge Reynaldo G. Garza)
  4. U.S. v. Concha, No. 99-2171 (10th Cir.) (233 F.3d 1249) (December 1, 2000) (Judge David M. Ebel)
  5. Vasquez v. Reno, No. 00-1505 (1st Cir.) (233 F.3d 688) (December 8, 2000) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
  6. U.S. v. Munoz, No. 99-50195 (9th Cir.) (233 F.3d 1117) (December 6, 2000) (Judge Richard C. Tallman)
  7. Anastasoff v. U.S., No. 99-3917EM (8th Cir.) (235 F.3d 1054) (December 18, 2000) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
  8. U.S. v. Meyer, No. 99-1919 (7th Cir.) (234 F.3d 319) (December 4, 2000) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)

More from these topics: