Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Sturgis, No. 00-2584 (8th Cir.) (238 F.3d 956) (February 6, 2001) (Judge Kermit Edward Bye)

Loaded on Jan. 1, 2001 published in Punch and Jurists January 22, 2001
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.

One of the issues involved in this case was an Apprendi sentencing claim; and, although the Court was willing to concede that there was one Apprendi error (in fact there were two), it stretched the limits of both logic and law to deny any relief - even though the effective ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Smith, No. 99-4253 (7th Cir.) (241 F.3d 546) (February 8, 2001) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
  2. U.S. v. Sadolsky, No. 99-5780 (6th Cir.) (234 F.3d 938) (December 11, 2000) (Judge Richard F. Suhrheinrich)
  3. U.S. v. Norris, No. 97 CR 705-01 (E.D.N.Y.) (128 F.Supp.2d 739) (February 1, 2001) (Judge Eugene H. Nickerson)
  4. U.S. v. Sturgis, No. 00-2584 (8th Cir.) (238 F.3d 956) (February 6, 2001) (Judge Kermit Edward Bye)
  5. Flowers v. Walter, No. 99-35552 (9th Cir.) (239 F.3d 1096) (February 9, 2001) (Per Curiam)
  6. U.S. v. Tran, No. 99-1278(L) (2nd Cir.) (234 F.3d 798) (November 15, 2000) (Judge Fred I. Parker)
  7. Baidas v. Jennings, No. Civ.A 00-CV-72003-DT (E.D.Mich.) (123 F.Supp.2d 1052) (December 6, 1999) (Judge Avern Levin Cohn)

More from these topics: