Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Tran, No. 99-1278(L) (2nd Cir.) (234 F.3d 798) (November 15, 2000) (Judge Fred I. Parker)

Loaded on Jan. 1, 2001 published in Punch and Jurists January 22, 2001
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Jurisdictional Defects.

Here the Court held that the omission of an element in the indictment limits the court's subject-matter jurisdiction to trying, convicting, and sentencing the defendant solely on the facts and offenses charged in the indictment, and because the defect is jurisdictional, it cannot be cured by the absence of prejudice ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Smith, No. 99-4253 (7th Cir.) (241 F.3d 546) (February 8, 2001) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
  2. U.S. v. Sadolsky, No. 99-5780 (6th Cir.) (234 F.3d 938) (December 11, 2000) (Judge Richard F. Suhrheinrich)
  3. U.S. v. Norris, No. 97 CR 705-01 (E.D.N.Y.) (128 F.Supp.2d 739) (February 1, 2001) (Judge Eugene H. Nickerson)
  4. U.S. v. Sturgis, No. 00-2584 (8th Cir.) (238 F.3d 956) (February 6, 2001) (Judge Kermit Edward Bye)
  5. Flowers v. Walter, No. 99-35552 (9th Cir.) (239 F.3d 1096) (February 9, 2001) (Per Curiam)
  6. U.S. v. Tran, No. 99-1278(L) (2nd Cir.) (234 F.3d 798) (November 15, 2000) (Judge Fred I. Parker)
  7. Baidas v. Jennings, No. Civ.A 00-CV-72003-DT (E.D.Mich.) (123 F.Supp.2d 1052) (December 6, 1999) (Judge Avern Levin Cohn)

More from these topics: