U.S. v. White, No. 00-1113 (2nd Cir.) (240 F.3d 127) (February 13, 2001) (Judge Robert A. Katzmann)
Loaded on Jan. 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
January 29, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
Although much of this decision dealt with Apprendi issues, the Court did hold that the district court had erred in concluding that it did not have any authority to depart from the mandatory stacking provisions of USSG § 5G1.2.
This case is principally noted for its discussion of Apprendi v. ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Garcia, No. 99-51091 (5th Cir.) (242 F.3d 593) (February 15, 2001) (Judge Samuel B. Kent)
- Sanders v. U.S., No. 99-2516 (2nd Cir.) (2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 392) (January 11, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Ramirez, No. 98-6130 (6th Cir.) (242 F.3d 348) (February 16, 2001) (Judge Gilbert S. Merritt)
- U.S. v. White, No. 00-1113 (2nd Cir.) (240 F.3d 127) (February 13, 2001) (Judge Robert A. Katzmann)
- U.S. v. White, No. 00-1113 (2nd Cir.) (240 F.3d 127) (February 13, 2001) (Judge Robert A. Katzmann)
- U.S. v. White, No. 00-1113 (2nd Cir.) (240 F.3d 127) (February 13, 2001) (Judge Robert A. Katzmann)
- U.S. v. Castano-Vargas, No. 95CR.894(DAB) (S.D.N.Y.) (124 F.Supp.2d 185) (December 11, 2000) (Judge Deborah A. Batts)
- Ware v. U.S., No. 3:00-0262 (M.D.Tenn.) (124 F.Supp.2d 590) (December 8, 2000) (Judge Thomas A. Jr. Wiseman)
- U.S. v. Lewis, No. 00-4016 (4th Cir.) (235 F.3d 215) (December 19, 2000) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
- U.S. v. Fresnares-Torres, No. 99-30171 (9th Cir.) (235 F.3d 481) (December 15, 2000) (Judge Alfred T. Goodwin)
- U.S. v. Hishaw, No. 99-6258 (10th Cir.) (235 F.3d 565) (December 20, 2000) (Judge Robert H. Henry)
- U.S. v. Brown, No. 00-1046 (1st Cir.) (235 F.3d 2) (December 18, 2000) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Garcia, No. 99-51091 (5th Cir.) (242 F.3d 593) (February 15, 2001) (Judge Samuel B. Kent)
More from these topics:
- Washington Supreme Court: Nonexceptional Consecutive Terms of ‘Community Custody’ May Not Exceed Aggregate Term of 24 Months, May 15, 2024. Parole, Probation, Parole & Supervised Release, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences, Multiple Sentences, Aggregate Sentence.
- Sixth Circuit: Sentence Procedurally Unreasonable Where District Court Failed to Explain Decision to Impose Consecutive Sentences and Substantively Unreasonable Where Court Improperly Weighed Sentencing Factors, Oct. 1, 2023. Failure to Explain Consequences, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences, Impermissible Factors.
- Supreme Court of California: After Amendments to Three Strikes Law, Courts Retain Concurrent Sentencing Discretion for Qualifying Offenses Committed on Same Occasion or Arising From Same Operative Facts, Sept. 1, 2023. Three Strikes, Three Strikes Statutes/Rule, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- SCOTUS Announces § 924(c)(1)(D)(ii)’s Consecutive Sentence Mandate Not Applicable to § 924(j) Sentences, Aug. 1, 2023. Murder/Felony Murder, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Hawaii Supreme Court Rules That Time Served for Concurrent Sentences Can Be Counted Only Once for Sentence Credit, April 24, 2023. Credits, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Montana Supreme Court Grants State Prisoner 604 Days in Sentence Credit, April 1, 2023. Credits, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Fifth Circuit: Consecutive Sentence for FTA Must Be Part of ‘Total Punishment,’ Not Merely a Stacked Sentence, Nov. 15, 2020. Total Punishment, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Michigan Supreme Court Announces Court Must Inform Defendant of Consecutive Sentencing Authority When Accepting Plea, July 15, 2020. Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.