Skip navigation

Ware v. U.S., No. 3:00-0262 (M.D.Tenn.) (124 F.Supp.2d 590) (December 8, 2000) (Judge Thomas A. Jr. Wiseman)

Here, the court denied the petitioner's motion to review his sentence under 28 USC § 2255 based on Apprendi, holding that such a review was barred by the retroactivity rules of Teague v. Lane and that Apprendi did not announce a watershed rule.

In this decision, Judge Wiseman denied the …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login