Skip navigation

Ware v. U.S., No. 3:00-0262 (M.D.Tenn.) (124 F.Supp.2d 590) (December 8, 2000) (Judge Thomas A. Jr. Wiseman)

Here, the court denied the petitioner's motion to review his sentence under 28 USC ยง 2255 based on Apprendi, holding that such a review was barred by the retroactivity rules of Teague v. Lane and that Apprendi did not announce a watershed rule.

In this decision, Judge Wiseman denied the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login