Pyle v. Kansas, No. 50 (U.S. Supreme Court) (317 U.S. 213; 63 S.Ct. 177) (December 7, 2042) (Justice Murphy)
Here, continuing to express its serious concerns about the use of perjured testimony to achieve convictions (concerns first expressed in Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U.S. 103 (1935), the Court observed: " Petitioner's papers are inexpertly drawn, but they do set forth allegations that his imprisonment resulted from perjured testimony, knowingly ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login