Skip navigation

U.S. v. Moss, No. 99-3169 (8th Cir.) (252 F.3d 993) (June 11, 2001) (Judge David R. Hansen)

Here, over the dissent of Judge Richard S. Arnold, the Court held that Apprendi presents a "new rule of constitutional law" that is not a "watershed" decision and thus petitioners may not raise Apprendi claims retroactively on collateral review.

In this case, the majority held (over the dissent of Judge ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login