U.S. v. Caldwell, No. 98-2871 (8th Cir.) (255 F.3d 532) (July 6, 2001) (Per Curiam)
Loaded on June 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
August 13, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
Here, on remand from the Supreme Court, the Eighth Circuit affirmed the 160-month sentence that had been vacated since the defendant could have been sentenced to three consecutive sentences of 60 months each under USSG § 5G1.2(d).
Not long after the Supreme Court issued its momentous decision in Apprendi v. ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Descally, No. 99-4232 (11th Cir.) (254 F.3d 1328) (June 28, 2001) (Judge Myron H. Bright)
- U.S. v. Austin, No. 00-2933 (8th Cir.) (255 F.3d 593) (June 18, 2001) (Judge Paul A. Magnuson)
- Smith v. Zachary, No. 99-4084 (7th Cir.) (255 F.3d 466) (June 28, 2001) (Judge Terrence T. Evans)
- U.S. v. Gomez, No. 00-2249 (1st Cir.) (255 F.3d 31) (July 6, 2001) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. King, No. 00-3023 (D.C. Cir.) (254 F.3d 1098) (July 3, 2001) (Judge Douglas Ginsburg)
- Moore v. Morton, No. 98-5429 (3rd Cir.) (255 F.3d 95) (June 22, 2001) (Judge Anthony J. Scirica)
- U.S. v. Williams, No. 92 CR 1131 (E.D.N.Y.) (146 F.Supp.2d 249) (May 30, 2001) (Judge I. Leo Glasser)
- U.S. v. Baptiste, No. 99-31027 (5th Cir.) (264 F.3d 578) (August 31, 2001) (Judge Edith H. Jones)
- U.S. v. Cabeza, No. 00-14583 (11th Cir.) (258 F.3d 1256) (July 25, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Shabazz, No. 99-2388 (6th Cir.) (263 F.3d 603) (August 30, 2001) (Judge Alice M. Batchelder)
- U.S. v. Arrington, No. 00-3096 (8th Cir.) (255 F.3d 637) (June 28, 2001) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Gilliam, No. 00-2887 (7th Cir.) (255 F.3d 428) (June 28, 2001) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
- U.S. v. Antonakeas, No. 99-10002 (9th Cir.) (255 F.3d 714) (June 19, 2001) (Judge Proctor Jr. Hug)
- U.S. v. Caldwell, No. 98-2871 (8th Cir.) (255 F.3d 532) (July 6, 2001) (Per Curiam)
More from these topics:
- Washington Supreme Court: Nonexceptional Consecutive Terms of ‘Community Custody’ May Not Exceed Aggregate Term of 24 Months, May 15, 2024. Parole, Probation, Parole & Supervised Release, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences, Multiple Sentences, Aggregate Sentence.
- Sixth Circuit: Sentence Procedurally Unreasonable Where District Court Failed to Explain Decision to Impose Consecutive Sentences and Substantively Unreasonable Where Court Improperly Weighed Sentencing Factors, Oct. 1, 2023. Failure to Explain Consequences, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences, Impermissible Factors.
- Supreme Court of California: After Amendments to Three Strikes Law, Courts Retain Concurrent Sentencing Discretion for Qualifying Offenses Committed on Same Occasion or Arising From Same Operative Facts, Sept. 1, 2023. Three Strikes, Three Strikes Statutes/Rule, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- SCOTUS Announces § 924(c)(1)(D)(ii)’s Consecutive Sentence Mandate Not Applicable to § 924(j) Sentences, Aug. 1, 2023. Murder/Felony Murder, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Hawaii Supreme Court Rules That Time Served for Concurrent Sentences Can Be Counted Only Once for Sentence Credit, April 24, 2023. Credits, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Montana Supreme Court Grants State Prisoner 604 Days in Sentence Credit, April 1, 2023. Credits, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Fifth Circuit: Consecutive Sentence for FTA Must Be Part of ‘Total Punishment,’ Not Merely a Stacked Sentence, Nov. 15, 2020. Total Punishment, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Michigan Supreme Court Announces Court Must Inform Defendant of Consecutive Sentencing Authority When Accepting Plea, July 15, 2020. Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.