U.S. v. Jordan, No. 97-10255 (9th Cir.) (256 F.3d 922) (July 5, 2001) (Judge Ronald M. Gould)
Here the Court held the district court committed plain error by using only a preponderance of the evidence to impose two sentencing enhancements that more than doubled the defendant's sentence, but refused to apply the Apprendi rule to the enhancements.
This is another in a series of recent decisions by ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login