Skip navigation

U.S. v. Sewell, No. 00-1604 (2nd Cir.) (252 F.3d 647) (June 11, 2001) (Judge Rosemary S. Pooler)

Here the Court held that the defense of voluntary intoxication is not a defense to the general intent crime of bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. ยง 2113(a).

In this case, the defendant claimed that the district court erred when it denied him the opportunity to present evidence that he was ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login