Skip navigation

U.S. v. Harris, No. 00-4154 (4th Cir.) (243 F.3d 806) (March 20, 2001) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)

Here the Court held that, based on the language, structure, context, and history of 18 USC § 924(c)(1)(A), an enhancement for "brandishing" a gun is a sentencing factor, not an element of the offense, and thus is not subject to the Apprendi-rule.

This case addresses the impact, if any, of ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login