Skip navigation

Brannigan v. U.S., No. 01-1335 (7th Cir.) (249 F.3d 584) (March 14, 2001) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)

Here the Court held that a Court of Appeals must deny a successive habeas application that presents a claim omitted from a prior petition, unless that claim was "previously unavailable" to the prisoner.

Here the Court held that, while 28 USC ยง 2244(b)(2)(A) provides an independent reason for denying a ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login